![critique of jesus and john wayne critique of jesus and john wayne](https://public-platform.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2020/09/26204254/Englewood-Reivew-Books-Screencapture-1024x820.jpg)
Likewise, the people issuing anti-jeremiad jeremiads continue to denounce dangers and errors in the outside culture. Ouça o 48 Jesus and John Wayne de Recovering Evangelicals instantaneamente no seu tablet, telefone ou navegador - sem fazer qualquer download. But those worried now about jeremiads are not Episcopalians but Puritans-the very ones who have insisted, rightly, that truth matters and who have worked to shore up doctrinal clarity even on issues where evangelicals disagree (such as predestination or women in ministry). Over the last two weeks, we’ve looked at how the Gospel of Jesus was changed from being a message of love, forgiveness and liberation into one of fear, guilt, shame, and unworthiness.
![critique of jesus and john wayne critique of jesus and john wayne](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/344890493_Review_-_Jesus_and_John_Wayne/links/5f9717b8a6fdccfd7b80e528/smallpreview.png)
![critique of jesus and john wayne critique of jesus and john wayne](https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/321/2021/03/JohnWayne-TheBigTrail.jpg)
It’s a strong book that says things about the recent history of American evangelicalism that should have been said a long time ago. Years ago I might have expected such a line from the folks who repeat, “Doctrine divides and love unites” and who look for ways to “affirm” everything. If social media is any indication, everyone loves Kristin Kobes Du Mez’s book Jesus and John Wayne. It’s also baffling to be told that speaking about dangers and errors is a failure of love for one’s fellow evangelicals. As a historian, Du Mez charts the rise of militant white masculinity (p. It was featured on NPR’s Morning Edition and received social media recommendations from Beth Moore, Jemar Tisby, Karen Swallow Prior, and Duke Kwon. It’s confusing to see these anti-jeremiad arguments coming from people who have endorsed jeremiads about the cheap grace of evangelical conversionism contradicting “the gospel according to Jesus” or how evangelical flirtations with relativism and pragmatism would leave “no place for truth.” These older jeremiads were timely and necessary, even if one didn’t agree with every point. Kristin Du Mez’s Jesus and John Wayne has struck a chord with both Christians and non-Christians. Usually, though, the jeremiads against jeremiads are directed toward those who are doctrinally fully within the conservative evangelical camp and are warning that something is awfully awry. A few of these critiques are prompted by books like Kristin Kobes Du Mez’s Jesus and John Wayne, which argues that evangelicalism’s problems are deeper than we think. Amid the meltdown within evangelical Christianity, some are warning against the dangers of the jeremiad.